Are UK And Australian Sanctions On Myanmar's Military Justified? A Critical Analysis

Pedro Alvarez

5 min read

Post on May 13, 2025

4.2

Share

The brutal crackdown on pro-democracy protestors in Myanmar has prompted a wave of international sanctions, with the UK and Australia among the nations imposing significant restrictions on the military junta. But are these UK and Australian sanctions on Myanmar's military justified, and are they effective? This article will critically analyze the justification and effectiveness of these sanctions, examining the human rights violations, economic impact, international legal framework, and exploring alternative approaches.

<h2>The Human Rights Catastrophe in Myanmar and the Justification for Sanctions</h2>

<h3>The Severity of Human Rights Violations</h3>

The February 2021 military coup in Myanmar triggered a catastrophic human rights crisis. The subsequent violence against civilians constitutes widespread and systematic human rights abuses, including genocide, ethnic cleansing, extrajudicial killings, torture, and sexual violence. Reports from the UN, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch detail horrific accounts of atrocities committed against Rohingya Muslims and other ethnic minorities, as well as pro-democracy activists. These Myanmar human rights crisis reports paint a grim picture of a military junta systematically violating the most fundamental human rights. Key elements consistently highlighted include:

• Massacres of civilians in villages and towns.
• Arbitrary arrests and detentions without due process.
• The use of excessive force against peaceful protestors.
• Systematic targeting of journalists and human rights defenders.
• Widespread displacement and the creation of humanitarian crises.

These actions constitute clear violations of international human rights law, making the situation a grave concern for the international community. The keywords ethnic cleansing, genocide, and human rights violations accurately reflect the severity of the ongoing crisis.

<h3>International Legal Framework and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P)</h3>

The international community’s response to the Myanmar human rights crisis is rooted in international law. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, enshrined in UN resolutions, highlights the responsibility of states to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. When a state fails to protect its own population, the international community has a responsibility to intervene. The UN Security Council, while hampered by veto power, has issued numerous resolutions condemning the violence in Myanmar and calling for an end to the military junta’s actions. The legal basis for international sanctions and targeted sanctions, such as those imposed by the UK and Australia, stems from this responsibility to protect.

<h3>The Role of the UK and Australia in the International Response</h3>

Both the UK and Australia have imposed targeted sanctions on the Myanmar military, aiming to hold those responsible for the atrocities accountable. These UK sanctions and Australia sanctions include:

• Asset freezes: Freezing assets held by individuals and entities linked to the military.
• Travel bans: Prohibiting individuals associated with the military from entering the UK and Australia.
• Arms embargoes: Preventing the supply of arms and military equipment to the Myanmar military.

These actions are explicitly justified by the UK and Australian governments as a response to the grave human rights abuses committed by the Myanmar military, reflecting their commitment to upholding international law and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P).

<h2>Assessing the Effectiveness of Sanctions on Myanmar's Military</h2>

<h3>Economic Impact and Intended Consequences</h3>

The economic sanctions imposed on Myanmar aim to weaken the military’s financial capabilities, reducing their ability to fund their operations and perpetuate violence. The intended consequence is to limit the military funding sources and pressure the junta to change its behavior. However, assessing the sanctions effectiveness is complex. While some evidence suggests a negative impact on the Myanmar economy, it is difficult to isolate the effect of sanctions from other factors contributing to the economic downturn. Furthermore, there are concerns about the unintended consequences of sanctions, potentially harming the civilian population through reduced access to essential goods and services.

<h3>Political Impact and Changes in Military Behavior</h3>

Evaluating the political impact of sanctions requires careful analysis. It is difficult to definitively prove a direct causal link between sanctions and changes in the military’s behavior, particularly regarding military reform or a move toward democratic transition. While sanctions may contribute to increased pressure, the military’s response is influenced by numerous internal and external factors, making it challenging to isolate the sanctions effectiveness in this area. Measuring the impact of sanctions on regime change remains a complex and ongoing research endeavor.

<h3>Alternative Approaches and Considerations</h3>

While sanctions play a role, alternative approaches are crucial to addressing the crisis effectively. These include:

• Strengthening diplomatic pressure: Working with regional and international partners to exert coordinated pressure on the military junta.
• Supporting independent international investigation: Ensuring accountability for atrocities committed through robust investigations and prosecutions.
• Providing sustained support to civil society organizations: Empowering local human rights defenders and pro-democracy groups.

These alternative solutions can complement sanctions, creating a more comprehensive strategy for addressing the Myanmar human rights crisis.

<h2>Conclusion: A Critical Evaluation of UK and Australian Sanctions on Myanmar's Military</h2>

This analysis reveals the multifaceted nature of the situation in Myanmar. While the UK and Australian sanctions on Myanmar's military are justified given the severity of human rights violations and the international legal framework, their effectiveness remains a subject of ongoing debate. The sanctions' economic and political impact is complex, and unintended consequences must be carefully considered. Alternative approaches, such as enhanced diplomatic pressure, support for civil society, and international investigations, are essential complements to sanctions. A holistic strategy encompassing multiple approaches is crucial to effectively address the ongoing crisis. Learn more about the impact of UK and Australian sanctions on Myanmar's military, and consider how to support human rights in Myanmar. Demand stronger and more effective international action against human rights abuses in Myanmar through targeted sanctions and other measures.