Arithmetic Sequences: Sums And Term Count Explained
Hey guys! Today, we're diving deep into the world of arithmetic sequences. We'll be tackling some awesome problems that involve finding sums, determining the number of terms, and exploring the relationships between different parts of these sequences. Get ready to flex those math muscles! Let's get started and make math fun and engaging!
1. Finding the Minimum Number of Terms for a Sum Greater Than 300
So, we've got this arithmetic sequence: $-4, -2, 0, 2, 4, \ldots$. The main challenge here is to figure out the least number of terms we need to add up so that the sum goes over 300. It's like we're chasing a target sum, and we need to know how many steps (terms) it will take to get there. This involves understanding how arithmetic sequences work and how their sums grow as we include more terms.
First, let's break down what we know. The first term, often denoted as $a_1$, is -4. The common difference, $d$, is the consistent amount we add to get from one term to the next. In this case, $d = -2 - (-4) = 2$. This means we're adding 2 each time to get the next number in the sequence. Understanding this common difference is crucial because it dictates how quickly our sequence will grow and, consequently, how quickly the sum will increase. Think of it as the engine that drives the sequence forward; a larger common difference means a faster-growing sequence and sum.
Now, to tackle the sum, we need the formula for the sum of an arithmetic series. Remember this one, guys; it's a lifesaver! The sum of the first $n$ terms, $S_n$, is given by: $S_n = \frac{n}{2}[2a_1 + (n-1)d]$. This formula is like our magic key to solving the problem. It connects the number of terms ($n$), the first term ($a_1$), the common difference ($d$), and the sum ($S_n$). By plugging in the values we know, we can create an equation that helps us find the unknown number of terms.
Let's plug in our values: $a_1 = -4$ and $d = 2$. We want to find the smallest $n$ such that $S_n > 300$. So, we set up the inequality: $\frac{n}{2}[2(-4) + (n-1)2] > 300$. Now, it's time to simplify and solve for $n$. This involves a bit of algebraic manipulation, but don't worry, we'll take it step by step. Simplifying the inequality is like untangling a knot; each step brings us closer to the solution. This part is all about careful algebra: distributing, combining like terms, and isolating $n$. Remember, the goal is to get $n$ by itself on one side of the inequality so we can see what values it can take.
First, distribute and simplify: $\frac{n}{2}[-8 + 2n - 2] > 300$, which becomes $\frac{n}{2}[2n - 10] > 300$. Then, multiply both sides by 2 to get rid of the fraction: $n[2n - 10] > 600$. Next, distribute the $n$: $2n^2 - 10n > 600$. To solve this quadratic inequality, we need to bring everything to one side: $2n^2 - 10n - 600 > 0$. Now, let's simplify by dividing by 2: $n^2 - 5n - 300 > 0$. This quadratic inequality is like a puzzle; we need to find the values of $n$ that make the expression greater than zero. Solving it often involves finding the roots of the corresponding quadratic equation and then testing intervals to see where the inequality holds true.
We can solve this quadratic inequality by factoring or using the quadratic formula. Factoring might be tricky here, so let's use the quadratic formula: $n = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}$. In our case, $a = 1$, $b = -5$, and $c = -300$. Plugging these values in gives us $n = \frac{5 \pm \sqrt{(-5)^2 - 4(1)(-300)}}{2(1)}$, which simplifies to $n = \frac{5 \pm \sqrt{25 + 1200}}{2}$ or $n = \frac{5 \pm \sqrt{1225}}{2}$. Since $\sqrt{1225} = 35$, we have $n = \frac{5 \pm 35}{2}$. This gives us two possible values for $n$: $n = 20$ and $n = -15$. Because the number of terms cannot be negative, we discard $n = -15$. This step is crucial; we're dealing with a real-world context (number of terms), so negative solutions don't make sense. Always think about the practical implications of your answers.
The roots of the quadratic equation are $n = 20$ and $n = -15$. Since we are looking for the number of terms, we can disregard the negative value. Now, we need to test the intervals determined by these roots in our inequality $n^2 - 5n - 300 > 0$. The intervals are $(-\infty, -15)$, $(-15, 20)$, and $(20, \infty)$. We're interested in positive integer values of $n$, so we only need to consider the interval $(20, \infty)$. Let's test $n = 21$: $21^2 - 5(21) - 300 = 441 - 105 - 300 = 36 > 0$. So, the inequality holds for $n > 20$. This means we need more than 20 terms for the sum to be greater than 300.
Since we need the least number of terms, we take the smallest integer greater than 20, which is 21. Therefore, the least number of terms needed for the sum to be greater than 300 is 21. This final step is where we bring it all together. We've done the math, but now we need to interpret the result in the context of the problem. We're not just looking for a number; we're looking for the smallest number of terms that meets a specific condition. So, we choose the next whole number after our calculated value, making sure it fits the problem's requirements.
2. Exploring Sums of Arithmetic Progressions
Next up, we have a slightly different kind of problem. We're told that the sum of the first 5 terms of an arithmetic progression (A.P.) is 25, and the sum of the first 15 terms is 225. The goal here is a bit more open-ended; we want to explore what we can find out about this A.P. This could mean finding the first term, the common difference, or even a general formula for the nth term. It's like being given a puzzle with multiple pieces, and we need to see how they fit together to reveal the bigger picture. This type of problem tests our understanding of the relationships between different aspects of an arithmetic progression and our ability to use the given information to uncover hidden properties.
Let's use the formula for the sum of the first $n$ terms of an A.P. again: $S_n = \fracn}{2}[2a_1 + (n-1)d]$. We have two pieces of information = 225$. Let's plug these into the formula and see what we get. This is like setting up a system of equations; we have two unknowns ($a_1$ and $d$), and two equations, so we should be able to solve for them. Translating the given information into mathematical equations is a key step in problem-solving. It allows us to use the power of algebra to find the unknowns.
For $S_5 = 25$, we have: $25 = \frac{5}{2}[2a_1 + (5-1)d]$, which simplifies to $25 = \frac{5}{2}[2a_1 + 4d]$. Multiplying both sides by $\frac{2}{5}$ gives us $10 = 2a_1 + 4d$. We can simplify further by dividing by 2: $5 = a_1 + 2d$. This is our first equation, a linear relationship between the first term and the common difference.
Now, let's do the same for $S_15} = 225${2}[2a_1 + (15-1)d]$, which simplifies to $225 = \frac{15}{2}[2a_1 + 14d]$. Multiply both sides by $\frac{2}{15}$ to get $30 = 2a_1 + 14d$. Divide by 2 to simplify: $15 = a_1 + 7d$. This is our second equation, another linear relationship between the first term and the common difference. Now we have a system of two linear equations with two variables.
We now have a system of equations:
We can solve this system using substitution or elimination. Let's use elimination. Subtract the first equation from the second equation: $(a_1 + 7d) - (a_1 + 2d) = 15 - 5$, which simplifies to $5d = 10$. Divide by 5 to find $d = 2$. This is a significant step; we've found the common difference! Knowing the common difference gives us a key piece of the puzzle. It tells us how the sequence progresses from one term to the next.
Now that we have $d$, we can plug it back into either equation to find $a_1$. Let's use the first equation: $a_1 + 2(2) = 5$, so $a_1 + 4 = 5$, and therefore $a_1 = 1$. We've found the first term as well! This is like finding the starting point of our sequence. Now we know where it all begins.
So, we've found that the first term $a_1$ is 1 and the common difference $d$ is 2. Now, let's find a general formula for the $n^{th}$ term of the A.P. The general formula is $a_n = a_1 + (n-1)d$. Plugging in our values, we get $a_n = 1 + (n-1)2$, which simplifies to $a_n = 1 + 2n - 2$ or $a_n = 2n - 1$. This formula is powerful; it allows us to find any term in the sequence just by plugging in the term number. It's like having a map that shows us exactly where each term is located in the sequence.
We've successfully found the first term, the common difference, and the general formula for the nth term. We've explored this A.P. pretty thoroughly! This whole process shows how interconnected the different parts of an arithmetic progression are. By knowing just a few pieces of information, we can uncover a wealth of knowledge about the sequence.
Wrapping Up
So guys, we've tackled some fantastic problems involving arithmetic sequences today! We've seen how to find the minimum number of terms needed for a sum to exceed a certain value and how to explore the properties of an A.P. given information about its sums. Remember, the key is to break down the problem, use the formulas, and think step by step. Keep practicing, and you'll become arithmetic sequence masters in no time! And always remember, math can be fun when we approach it with curiosity and a willingness to explore. So, keep exploring, keep questioning, and keep learning!